How A Terrorist is Made in Sunni and Shia Sects

After every terrorist attack and news about ISIS, the sectarians report that the terrorists do not represent Islam and that they are not Muslim. Although this is true when we analyze how the mainstream Islam is designed we have to conclude that the majority of the sectarians are indeed responsible for the creation of terrorists and other criminals.

1. Hadith Buffet Restaurant: Sayings of the Prophets which happen to be rumors and gossips collected about him after 250 years of his death. Hadiths are like buffet carrying both positive and negative corruptions. Some are extremely brutal. The buffet system helps mainstream Muslims cherry pick their religious duties and views.

Demo:
Sunni #1: You should kill the exMuslims. It is instructed in a hadith.
Sunni #2: You should not kill the exMuslims. It is instructed in a hadith.

2. Abrogation of Quran verses. Yes, in sectarian Islam, it is fully okay to cancel Quran verses. This is how they can ignore the fact that God allows only defensive war in the Quran and even in that strict rules are to be applied.

3. Power in the hands of mullas. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

4. The idea that one should not approach Quran all by himself. The mullas keep singing that Quran is extremely difficult to understand and that it should not be read without the hadiths. Anyone who wishes to leave the sect to follow Quran alone is to be treated like exmuslims and/or killed. In short, independent thought process in the religion is forbidden.

5. Majority of the sectarian Muslims are illiterate about Islam.They don't go beyond the 5 pillows like prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, and so on. This has created a crisis in faith. Parents don't know how to answer their kids about the religion. The ultimate cure ends up being the mullas, the satan worshipers.

Daraba as Beating Wife Violates Verse 4:19

Blind faith in men is dangerous. Nothing but the twisted meanings of the Quran verses are an example of this. Apparently, it is religiously claimed that verse 4:34 tells husbands to beat their wives. This corruption stems from the hadiths. Here is one example:
Lo! My last recommendation to you is that you should treat women well. Truly they are your helpmates, and you have no right over them beyond that - EXCEPT IF THEY COMMIT A MANIFEST INDECENCY. If they do, then refuse to share their beds and HIT THEM WITHOUT INDECENT VIOLENCE . Then, if they obey you, do not show them hostility any longer. Lo! you have a right over your women and they have a right over you. Your right over your women is that they not allow whom you hate to enter your bed nor your house. While their right over them is that you treat them excellently in their garb and provision
Plenty of women have already become victims of physical assault because of this ugly corruption. The criticism raised against it has forced some of the scholars to lurk around the following tafseer:
Men are the support of women as God gives some more means than others, and because they spend of their wealth (to provide for them). So women who are virtuous are obedient to God and guard the hidden as God has guarded it. As for women who are averse in behavior, talk to them persuasively, leave them alone in bed and tap them (like a doctor would tap a patient - lightly), if they open out to you, do not seek an excuse for blaming them. Surely God is sublime and great.
This does not do justice either. Daraba still means hitting. What we need to remember is that Quran does not contradict. This is the formula to knowing what Allah tells us to do. The truth is that daraba's meaning as beating ferociously violates the following verse:
4:19 O you who have believed, it is not lawful for you to inherit women by compulsion. And do not make difficulties for them in order to take [back] part of what you gave them unless they commit a clear immorality. And live with them in kindness. For if you dislike them - perhaps you dislike a thing and Allah makes therein much good.
Notice how Allah forbids the use of force on women. But whether decent beating or tapping, they all directly tell the husbands to make wives obedient through force, violating 4:19. Those who stick to the idea that daraba means separating are, therefore, right. Do remember that even in the case of "clear immorality" Allah does not instruct the men to beat their wives. 

Same History of Talmud and Hadiths: You be the Judge

Talmud
Hadiths of Bukhari and Friends
1. It is a foundation of our faith to believe that God gave Moses an oral explanation of the Torah along with the written text. source




2. G‑d told Moses that he will give him "the Torah and the commandments." Why did G‑d add the word "commandments?" Are there any commandments which are not included in the Torah? This verse (amongst others) is a clear inference to the existence of the Oral Torah. source


3. Without an oral tradition, some of the Torah's laws would be incomprehensible. In the Shema's first paragraph, the Bible instructs: "And these words which I command you this day shall be upon your heart. And you shall teach them diligently to your children, and you shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk on the road, when you lie down and when you rise up. And you shall bind them for a sign upon your hand, and they shall be for frontlets between your eyes." "Bind them for a sign upon your hand," the last verse instructs. Bind what? The Torah doesn't say. "And they shall be for frontlets between your eyes." What are frontlets? The Hebrew word for frontlets, totafot is used three times in the Torah — always in this context (Exodus 13:16; Deuteronomy 6:8, 11:18) — and is as obscure as is the English. Only in the Oral Law do we learn that what a Jewish male should bind upon his hand and between his eyes are tefillin (phylacteries). source

4. Originally the Oral Law was not transcribed. Instead it was transmitted from father to son and from teacher to disciple (thus the name "Oral" Law) source.


5. Although much of the work may have already been done by previous generations of rabbis, the monumental task of editing, explaining and organizing this vast amount of material was left to Rabbi Yehudah. The end result of this massive undertaking was a definitive, yet cryptic (the basic principles were all there yet a teacher was still required to elucidate the material) version of the entire Oral Law source









6. Defining Mishna: A noun formed from the verb "shanah," which has the same meaning as the Aramaic "matnita," derived from "teni" or "tena." The verb "shanah," which originally meant "to repeat," acquired in post-Biblical Hebrew the special force of "to teach" and "to learn" that which was not transmitted in writing but only orally; the development of connotation being due to the fact that the retention of teachings handed down by word of mouth was possible only by frequent recitation. source

7. The Mishnah is sometimes called Shas (an acronym for Shisha Sedarim – the "six orders"), though that term is more often used for the Talmud as a whole. The six orders are:

Zera'im ("Seeds"), dealing with prayer and blessings, tithes and agricultural laws (11 tractates)
Mo'ed ("Festival"), pertaining to the laws of the Sabbath and the Festivals (12 tractates)
Nashim ("Women"), concerning marriage and divorce, some forms of oaths and the laws of the nazirite (7 tractates)
Nezikin ("Damages"), dealing with civil and criminal law, the functioning of the courts and oaths (10 tractates)
Kodashim ("Holy things"), regarding sacrificial rites, the Temple, and the dietary laws (11 tractates) and
Tohorot ("Purities"), pertaining to the laws of purity and impurity, including the impurity of the dead, the laws of food purity and bodily purity (12 tractates).
1. The Qur’an is the message, and the Hadith is the explanation of the message by the Messenger himself source .In this article, I will prove, using verses from the Quran, that Prophet Muhammed (p) did indeed receive other revelation besides the Quran source.


2. Recall how Shafi Shafi popularized the rumor that hikma means sunnah by using the verse in which Allah says he gave the Prophet the Book and wisdom.






3. If anyone's interpretation of the Qur'an was to be accepted and there was no hadiths at all, then we would not know why certain things were mentioned in the Qur'an source.

Much of Islam will remain mere abstract concepts without Hadith. We would never know how to pray, fast, pay zakah, or make pilgrimage without the illustration found in Hadith, for these acts of worship remain as abstract imperatives in the Qur’an source.











4. A hadith was originally an oral tradition about the actions and customs and opinions of the  Muhammad source.



5.Before Imam Bukhari (R.A) had started to collect ahaadeeth there had actually been quite a few published books of ahaadeeth in which Imam Bukhari (R.A) found ahaadeeth of both weak and strong testimonials, which gave him the idea to compile such a kitaab containing ahaadeeth of only strong testimonials. Ishaaq Ibn Rahway (R.A) agreed to this idea which strengthened Imam Bukhari’s (R.A) decision.
 source








6. Defining Musnad: Al-Hakim defines a Musnad ("supported") hadith as follows: "A hadith which a traditionalist reports from his shaikh from whom he is known to have heard (ahadith) at a time of life suitable for learning, and similarly in turn for each shaikh, until the isnad reaches a well- known Companion, who in turn reports from the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace). source



7. Six Major Hadith books
Sahih Bukhari, collected by Imam Bukhari (d. 870), includes 7000+ ahadith
Sahih Muslim, collected by Muslim b. al-Hajjaj (d. 875), includes 9000+ ahadith
Sunan al-Nasa'i, collected by al-Nasa'i (d. 915)
Sunan Abu Dawood, collected by Abu Dawood (d. 888)
Jami al-Tirmidhi, collected by al-Tirmidhi (d. 892)
Sunan ibn Majah, collected by Ibn Majah (d. 887)